Q: Where would an election of Okada Katsuya, the avatar of all that is clean and dull in Japanese politics, make a significant difference in the electability of Democratic Party of Japan candidates?
A: In the marginal constituencies--electoral districts which the DPJ lost in 2005 or where the Liberal Democratic Party has been on a longterm downward trend despite the efforts of the local LDP representative. The election of Okada over Hatoyama Yukio, who is perceived, fairly or not, to be the disgraced-in-the-eyes-of-the-media Ozawa Ichirō's dauphin, could claw back tens of thousands votes lost in the aftermath of the Ōkubo Toshinori arrest, and turn the district Democratic.
Q: So which districts will have zero (0) votes in Saturday's DPJ party president election?
A: Districts which do not have DPJ legislators representing them...which includes all the ones lost in 2005 and all the one which could conceivable go Democratic, given the right party leader.
Q: So districts where the identity of the leader of the DPJ could be significant are excluded from the process, whilst current--and one would assume solidly DPJ--districts where the identity of the party leader does not matter, get to choose?
A: Yes, that's right.
Q: But that's crazy! Giving a vote to party members who might not really care whilst denying it to those who probably do...is putting the future of the party in the hands of persons with almost no personal stake in the outcome! Why did the party leadership council agree to this madness?
A: That would assume that someone other than Ozawa had thought through, step-by-step, the process of selecting a new leader ahead of time.
Q: Which is not something that Ozawa's challengers are likely to have done?
A: Unfortunately, no. And now they are reaping the consequences of their lack of planning for contingencies.
WSJ Archive: Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima
1 hour ago